But beyond the issue of medical or public health malpractice, I am most concerned about the simple principle of honesty. As medical and health professionals, our very first obligation is to be truthful with our patients and with the public. The information being provided by this respiratory therapist is untruthful. It is simply not the case that smoking may be less hazardous than vaping. There is no credible scientific debate about that issue in the year 2014.

The report issued by these lawmakers calls for a ban on flavors in e-cigarettes.

My first vendor was a small startup that recently opened for business. Their place was smaller than most B&Ms, but they did have a dedicated room for E-Juice making unlike some other stores I’ve seen that has it out in the open. The owner/E-Juice maker explained to me that everything they do is hand made that is customers can choose whatever ratio and nicotine levels they want when they purchase. Some stores pre-make their E-Juice so that they can easily and quickly check out their customers. The owner believed more in customer service than that of speed and convenience as he knows every person is different in what he/she wants and he would much rather have a happy customer than someone who is dissatisfied.

Even the e-cigarette industry itself supports this legislation. How ironic, then, that the state's physicians, along with other "anti-smoking" groups, are opposing this bill, which was enacted by the legislature and awaits the governor's signature. The "anti-smoking" and "health" groups are urging the governor to veto the bill.

To understand how ridiculous Dr. Glantz's extrapolation is, consider some of the other exposures that also cause reductions in exhaled nitric oxide:

LAST：ecigs ego twist vv battery |NEXT：2014 china dry herb cartomizer 510 electronic cigarettte dry herb cartomizer 510 cloupor cloutank