For this reason, I am discouraged about the possibility that people like Dr. Glantz and Dr. Chapman will change their minds about the potential utility of e-cigarettes if further evidence accumulates to demonstrate the benefits of these products. The science is simply not going to matter to them. Hopefully, the science will matter to the FDA.

While the FDA has given its official stamp of approval to the "normal" cigarettes that are killing more than 400,000 Americans each year and has taken no action to reduce the hazards of smoking, we can all be grateful that the agency has stepped in to protect the public from cigarettes that smell or taste wrong.

The above argument is convenient for advocates who want to suppress "negative" or "unfavorable" findings by discouraging RCTs - which they believe will "underestimate" the effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and encouraging survey studies - which they believe will show the effects of vapor products in all their possible glory. However, the argument carries with it a lack of scientific validity.

LAST：Hot selling e liquid ego ce5 , paypal acceptable |NEXT：electronic cigarette Top selling product wax ecigator ecig bluetooth ecig