In banning the sale of e-cigarettes to minors, the legislation defines e-cigarettes the way they should be defined: as vapor products or alternative nicotine products.

What the story demonstrates is that Dr. Glantz has a pre-determined set of conclusions about electronic cigarettes and the tobacco companies' role in inappropriately marketing these products to addict a new generation of kids. When presented with information, he jumps to an immediate interpretation and conclusion that supports his pre-determined schema. Instead of exercising critical judgment and objective evaluation of the evidence, he immediately twists the facts to support his pre-existing position. Dr. Glantz is just one example of a phenomenon that characterizes a number of researchers and tobacco control groups that are vehement opponents of electronic cigarettes for ideological, rather than valid scientific reasons.

Cigavette has designed their “smart chip” to provide a perfect, consistenttemp to the heating element to produce the most realistic tobacco taste from any electronic cigarette I have tasted.

Like Clive, I do not criticize Stan for having a different opinion on the issue of electronic cigarettes. Having a diversity of opinions is a healthy thing and in the long run, it will help ensure that the best possible public policies result. However, misrepresenting scientific evidence, deceiving the public about the science and what it shows, and lying to the media and the public about the science are simply not acceptable. They serve no positive purpose and in the long run, they end up undermining the credibility of the entire tobacco control movement.

LAST：China e cig manufacturer wholesale hookah vaporizer pen eGo-T retro best e cigarette |NEXT：2014 hot selling Eleaf/iSmoka iGo USB cable