Tobacco control advocates have often criticized scientists who were supported by the tobacco industry for failing to disclose their funding or other conflicts of interest, such as being paid to author commentaries critical of tobacco control policies. And rightly so. However, if we now engage in the very same tactics, then we become hypocrites, and our credibility in criticizing tobacco industry "hacks" is shot. We don't have any credibility in attacking "tobacco hacks" if we are "Big Pharma hacks."

While I agree with Stan on virtually every aspect of the regulation of cigarette marketing, we part ways when he advocates the suppression of the truth.

a. Substantial reductions in cigarette use;

The Rest of the Story

Clive goes on to cite two specific examples of conclusions that Glantz disseminated to the public which were not supported by his own research.

2. The regulations put a huge, if not insurmountable, obstacle in the way of new and innovative electronic cigarette products.

LAST：Hot selling e-cigarette Ego CE7 blister kit cartomizer and atomizer ohm meter |NEXT：Quality hot sale ego igo 4 e cigarette