Actually, what is completely disingenuous is the attempt of these politicians to pretend that they are committed to ending the use of flavorings to addict youth to nicotine. The rest of the story is that these same lawmakers chose not to ban the use of cigarette flavorings to addict youth to nicotine. Specifically, they have supported an exemption for menthol, which is the number one flavor used by cigarette companies to addict youth to nicotine and cigarette smoking.

As I remarked last week, I do not begrudge the CDC for holding a different position than I do on the e-cigarette issue. However, the agency crosses the line when it lies to the public in order to support its position. Dishonesty has no place on the agenda of a federal public health agency, especially one that is as highly reputed as the CDC.

One of the features that separates tobacco control research from research conducting historically by the tobacco companies is the integrity of our work. We want and need the public to view the integrity of tobacco control research as being higher than that of work which in the past was conducted by the tobacco companies. If it comes down to tobacco control researchers arguing that secondhand smoke is harmful and tobacco industry-funded studies suggesting that secondhand smoke is not harmful, we want the public to believe us. That requires that the public view our research integrity as being greater than that of the industry.

No.

The rest of the story is that despite the Common Rule and the intense efforts to try to prevent human subject violations in research, there are still occasional studies which find their way through the cracks. This is one bad example. It is an example of an unethical experiment that should never have been approved by an IRB in its current form because it blatantly violates the ethical principles of both consent and informed consent.

LAST：Silicone Baby Nasal Aspirator Mucus Cleaner - Pink |NEXT：high quality newest 1300mah battery x6 e cig