Whyso many tobacco control advocates want to protect cigarettes from competitionis baffling to me.

Moreover, these politicians - while callling for a ban on flavorings in fake cigarettes - are not calling for a similar ban on all flavorings in real cigarettes. They are not calling for a ban on the use of menthol cigarettes to addict kids. They are not calling on legislation to amend the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act to remove the menthol exemption. They are not calling upon the FDA to ban menthol.

Yesterday, I that Dr. Stan Glantz has accused electronic cigarette associations of being front groups for Big Tobacco, insinuating that they are masquerading as grassroots vapers' groups but in reality are working to protect Big Tobacco profits.

Why would we want to suppress the provision of this information to the public? And what justification is there for a government-mandated suppression of the truth?

"while we have heard from some former smokers who say e-cigarettes helped them quit, there is not yet any conclusive scientific evidence that e-cigarettes can work as a cessation aid."

The rest of the story is that Dr. Frieden continues to fabricate scientific evidence in an apparent effort to demonize electronic cigarettes. I have already reported how he that he purported to demonstrate that electronic cigarettes are a gateway to a lifetime addiction to smoking cigarettes. Here, he apparently makes up scientific evidence that large numbers of ex-smokers are returning to nicotine use by taking up vaping. While I follow the electronic cigarette literature extremely closely, I am aware of no studies which have shown that large numbers of ex-smokers are taking up vaping. In contrast, there is much evidence that large numbers of vapers are quitting smoking, and thus becoming ex-smokers.

LAST：2013 Hottest Clearomizer on HOT sale!!! 100% NO LEAKING X10 Clearomizer for KTS,K200,eGo Hottest Clearomizer at Low Price |NEXT：exgo w1for SIGELEI pop star electronic cigarette Sigelei mini zmax e cig