I then explain that the gateway hypothesis is actually unsupported by any scientific evidence and that there is some evidence which is inconsistent with the hypothesis.

Moreover, the proposed regulations do nothing to directly regulate product safety. For years to come, we would still have exploding batteries, leaking cartridges, and packaging that is not child-proof. After all, it is going to be a minimum of one year before the regulations are promulgated, another two years before the applications are due, and probably 5-6 years before the 22,000 new product applications can be processed (and that is only if the FDA acts in an unprecendentedly speedy fashion). So we're talking 8-9 years before we see any meaningful safety improvements.

According to the deeming regulations, electronic cigarettes cannot inform consumers that the electronic cigarette "presents a lower risk of tobacco-related disease or is less harmful than one or more other commercially marketed tobacco products" (which includes cigarettes). In other words, the marketing of electronic cigarettes will need to be based on the false pretense that e-cigarettes are not intended as a safer alternative to smoking.

Recent data (Monthly tracking of key performance indicators; Electronic cigarettes in England - latest trends) from the Smoking Toolkit Study (Cancer Research UK, UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies) reveal the following critical points:

LAST：Factory Price Vamo V5 ecigator, V5 e cig, china wholesale electronic Cigarette |NEXT：New technology electronic cigarette eGo ce5,CE5,Newest Super Vapor long wick eGo CE5 clearomizer