Perhaps it should be no surprise that these researchers have drawn such a wild and scientifically implausible conclusion like this, one which does not follow at all from their actual research. Why? Because, as I yesterday, these researchers had reached the conclusion of their study years ago, before even conducting the research! In fact, they drew their conclusions when they submitted their grant application. So it comes as no surprise to now see that they are drawing pre-determined conclusions that have nothing to do with their actual research.

Why would we want to suppress the provision of this information to the public? And what justification is there for a government-mandated suppression of the truth?

I can't add anything to this fine piece, so I'll leave it for readers to examine. I'll just close with the final paragraph of Newman's piece, which summarizes the situation incisively:

The letter picks up on many of the precise points that I have been arguing during the past few weeks: ; ; .

LAST：Hangsen Gold & Silver C5R Pro and battery ego ce4+ start kit ce4 clearomizer |NEXT：wholesale RDA atomizer zenith v2 rba clone/cat atomizer