The above argument is convenient for advocates who want to suppress "negative" or "unfavorable" findings by discouraging RCTs - which they believe will "underestimate" the effectiveness of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and encouraging survey studies - which they believe will show the effects of vapor products in all their possible glory. However, the argument carries with it a lack of scientific validity.

A scientist who is currently with the UCSF Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education (home of Dr. Stan Glantz) is part of a research team that conducted an on hundreds of thousands of Facebook users, whose Facebook news feed content was without their informed consent in order to try to trigger their emotions.

My point is that this appears to be a deliberate attempt to mislead the public. It is not consistent with just being a mistake, an issue of a differing interpretation of study results, or a lack of awareness of the study limitations.

The rest of the story is that by lying to thepublic, Senator Blumenthal has introduced politics into the debate anddemonstrated that Congress remains clearly in touch with political motives, notscience-based public health ones.

LAST：2013 new product best quality aio 510-t pcc e cigarette hot selling with competitive price |NEXT：China manufacturer phrex glass Aspire ET-S BDC clearomizer 1.8ohm