The major implication of this decision is that it exposes the degree to which financial conflicts of interest are plaguing the current tobacco control movement. It should force anti-smoking groups and federal agencies to take conflicts of interest more seriously.

By Stan's logic, we should throw out all the clinical trials upon which the established effectiveness of NRT is based because every one of these trials was designed to assess the efficacy of NRT among smokers who used these drugs with the specific intent to quit. Instead, according to Glantz's logic, we should examine the rate of smoking cessation among everyone who has ever used an NRT product. Doing that would lead to the conclusion that NRT is completely ineffective for smoking cessation.

In an published in BU Today, I argue that the tobacco control movement has been co-opted by a bureaucracy of large national organizations that are more interested in putting feathers in their cap than actually saving lives from smoking.

The degree to which electronic cigarettes stimulate or depress overall interest in quitting is a separate and empirically answerable question. In fact, evidence from the UK indicates that the spread of electronic cigarettes has been associated with a in the desire to quit smoking at a population level.

LAST：electronic cigarette free sample free shipping ce9 cartomizer and atomizer ohm meter |NEXT：Durable top sell pcc e starter kit