It would be a tragedy if policy makers use the conclusions of this "study" to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation purposes.

Using children cannot be a reason either. Yes, I agree some regulation is needed for advertising done and the bottles need to be properly labeled and child proof. However, there have been so little cases of nicotine poisoning and deaths that it seems absurd to use this as a justifiable reason. Not to mention most (I’m saying 99%) of all vendors do not advertise to children.

The European Respiratory Society, then, is opposed to the use of e-cigarettes at the present time in the United States. What this means is that the ERS would rather see smokers continue to use tobacco cigarettes than quit smoking by switching to electronic cigarettes.

"In summary, the rules state:

Thus, it appears that cigarette filters did produce a small but measurable decline in cancer risks associated with smoking, while further design changes that lowered tar levels did not. In other words, there is evidence that filtered cigarettes produce lower cancer risks than non-filtered cigarettes. However, within the filtered cigarette category, there is no evidence that low-tar cigarettes confer any reduced cancer risk.

"It is not known how much nicotine or other potentially harmful chemicals are inhaled by users, nor is it known whether e-cigarette use may lead to use of other tobacco products. Neither are the benefits of using e-cigarettes over traditional products known."

LAST：2014 Top Quality Newest Electronic Cigarette Vape Mod China Fully Mechanical Mod |NEXT：dry herb vaporizer 510-S clearomizer electric cigerette