As I revealed earlier this week, Stan Glantz has publicly which imply that electronic cigarette companies have been behind the scenes and paying for statements by a number of right-wing think tanks that are supportive of electronic cigarettes.

By publicly refuting the black box warning, Pfizer is literally spitting in the face of the FDA. This is not appropriate. The company should either be penalized and forced to discontinue its campaign of refutation of the black box warning findings, or the drug should be pulled from the market due to a finding that the company has violated the terms of the drug's approval.

The Rest of the Story

Recently, Stan Glantz and colleagues called for a on electronic cigarette flavorings. Other anti-smoking groups have also urged the FDA to implement a ban on the use of flavors in electronic cigarettes. I have already why such an intervention makes no sense because it essentially represents a ban on electronic cigarettes, prevents brand differentiation, and greatly decreases the appeal of these products, thus forever protecting the market share of tobacco cigarettes. Today, I explain why the flavors in electronic cigarettes probably play a role in deterring youth smoking. Thus, I provide another argument for why the FDA should not ban electronic cigarette flavors.

LAST：China manufacturer wholesale newest flat drip tip UT6 dual coil atomizer and ce6 clearomizer |NEXT：2013 new products Multi-function smart pcc innokin Aio 510 noble 1020mah