While I agree with the editorial, it is quite a condemnation of the current field of tobacco control research.

While the deeming regulations pretend to acknowledge that there is "a continuum of nicotine-delivering products" in terms of their health risks, the truth is that the agency fails to acknowledge that the most hazardous product along that continuum - cigarettes - are any more hazardous than the least dangerous product (non-tobacco electronic cigarettes).

The problem is that in this cross-sectional study, there is no way to determine the direction of the observed relationship.

Were I a reviewer of this grant, I certainly would not have funded it. Instead, I would have saved the money and encouraged the researchers to publish their pre-determined conclusions without wasting taxpayer dollars to pretend to be searching for an answer to a question that they have already answered.

LAST：most popular wholesale price igo m tank/igo m atomizer clone |NEXT：2014 New Year top sales E vapour e cig EVOD huge vapour electronic cig