Here is Glantz's accusation: "the e-cigarette companies (which are, increasingly owned by cigarette companies) are mobilizing the same network of right-wing think tanks that the cigarette companies have used for years to push their policy agenda, often linked with the tobacco companies' development of the Tea Party and related groups. John Mashey, a member of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education's Advisory Committee, sent me a few good examples. ... The more things change the more they stay the same."

While this study is preliminary because of the small sample size, it demonstrates that for smokers who are unable to quit smoking using traditional therapies, the use of electronic cigarettes may be a viable alternative to help them quit or substantially cut down and might result in improved respiratory health symptoms.

"They aren't harmless."

Like any regulation, there needs to be a way to fund it and this is where big brother comes in. Granted with a soon to be 3 billion dollar industry, many politicians want to get their greedy hands on it for taxation purposes, but will cripple the industry and many of the small business owners that own these vape shops (even the good ones). Although I am not opposed to taxation, 49% is a bit excessive considering it’ll be much more expensive to use E-Cigs vs regular cigarettes at that point (especially with how much E-Juice I go through a day). As of late there have and not being able to pay people back due to the rapid growth of the E-Cig industry.

LAST：2013 hot sale e smart e cig smart pcc |NEXT：2014 Newest arrival variable voltage e cigarette Provic S3 mod