The study concludes that e-cigarettes are not helpful for smoking cessation among cancer patients.

Sure, but only if the revenue is used to directly benefit those who are bearing its burden. Raise the cigarette tax and use the money to fund anti-smoking programs and services, research, and treatment for smokers, especially in poorer communities and communities of color, and the policy is no longer regressive but progressive. It could reduce, rather than exacerbate existing income and health inequities.

Ironically, Dr. Glantz (and numerous anti-smoking groups) are supporting the protective legislation. Which raises the question: Who is acting more as a Big Tobacco front group? The e-cigarette associations, which are fighting protective legislation for tobacco cigarettes, or Glantz and the anti-smoking groups, which are trying to get protective legislation ensconced in every state throughout the country, so that cigarette profits are protected nationwide?

The Rest of the Story

In the above analyses, the authors controlled for level of nicotine dependence.

LAST：Super new style e hookah hicig e cigarette,high quality hicig e cigarette huge vapor hicig e cig |NEXT：High quality!!! wholesale rda atomizer e cigarette CE5 atomizer /squape clone clearomizer