"The government has an obligation to carefully scrutinize any new consumer product that is presented as an alternative to smoking. But government agencies and public health officials have no business discouraging or disparaging e-cigarettes in the absence of any data that they are causing harm. This is especially the case when these products have so much potential to curb cigarette smoking, the public health scourge that still claims half a million lives a year."

“I smoked for over 30 years and have tried every quit smoking product and other e-cig brand out there and the day I started using Cigavette (8 months ago) was the last time I have had a tobacco cigarette. Cigavette is the best quality I have ever tried hands down and the customer support has been excellent.”(from Cigavette website)

The article purports to review the scientific evidence of the use of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation aid and it concludes that population-based studies have demonstrated that e-cigarettes inhibit quitting. Specifically, the article concludes as follows: "e-cigarette use in the real world is associated with significantly lower odds of quitting smoking cigarettes."

This is yet another example of the anti-smoking groups bemoaning a situation for which they are actually responsible. For example, the anti-smoking groups have complained about the menthol loophole, but it was the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and friends which insisted upon this loophole in the first place. The anti-smoking groups complained about the introduction of Marlboro No. 54, but again, it was the Campaign and its friends that made this introduction possible by exempting menthol as the only characterizing flavor allowed in cigarettes.

LAST：20%OFF v2 cigs 2014 new inventions iTaste 134 new e cig mod (SALES PROMOTION) |NEXT：popular electronical cigarette mini ecig kamry 1.0 mini ecig