I am not aware of any other federal law or regulation that prohibits companies from telling consumers the truth about their products as it relates to the primary benefit of the product. Hopefully, the FDA will see the error in its proposal and will reconsider its decision to subject electronic cigarettes to the provisions of section 911.

For example, I am proud of having been part of a team that was the first ever to report that the dietary supplement L-tryptophan can via the eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome. This important conclusion - which had major public health policy implications - was based on a single reported case of pulmonary hypertension. In other words, it was based on a single "anecdote." Had we dismissed this finding because a single anecdote is not data, then we would have failed to report this relationship and many more patients would have suffered that fate, possibly leading to fatalities.

Included in a recent editorial, Dr. Michael Katz mentioned that the FDA should monitor electronic cigarettes as a nicotine delivery tool, and that electronic cigarettes should continue to be banned in locations where typical tobacco products are not allowed. “Unfortunately, the evidence on whether e-cigarettes help smokers to quit is contradictory and inconclusive,” Katz wrote. He did say he was willing to support their use if “there were good data indicating that they helped smokers to stop.” Dr. Gilbert Ross, medical and executive director of The American Council on Science and Health, said “allowing e-cigs to compete with cigarettes in the marketplace might decrease smoking-related morbidity and mortality.”

LAST：High quality and best price quartz tank T2 wax pen 510 thread atomizer vaporizer wax in hengling |NEXT：Custom cigarrete lanyard/e cig lanyard ring/ego lanyard, diamond ego lanyard