This polarization is a disappointment to me, but I guess in an era where ideological-driven debates are raging over climate change, gun control, and immunization, I should not have expected this one to be any different.

According to the article: "UCR professor of cell biology Dr. Prue Talbot and her team discovered the chemicals used to refill electronic vapor cigarettes (e-cigarettes) may be more harmful than tobacco cigarettes. Her team discovered that electronic vapor requires a consumer to take deeper breaths which may potentially draw in harmful chemicals to fragile parts of the lungs, as opposed to a tobacco cigarette that burns on the other end, allowing the consumer less inhalation. “Our earlier studies with electronic cigarette refill fluids showed that some of these products were toxic to both mouse neural stem cells, (and) human embryonic stem cells as well as to adult lung cells,” she said in ."

If the FDA is not sure that removing all of the carcinogens from cigarettes - and reducing their concentrations to no more than trace levels - is going to make "smoking" safer (even forgetting the fact that there is no smoke and no combustion associated with vaping), then one has to ask whether the FDA is basing its positions only on science, and not on any political or ideological concerns.

The study concludes that e-cigarettes are not helpful for smoking cessation among cancer patients.

LAST：ego ce5 atomizer ego twist, high quality ego twist ce5 |NEXT：Newest e-cigarette iGo4-CE4 round bottomed charger e-cigarette, vceego igo 4 starter kit ecig starter kit