If this was advice given by Glantz to a smoker he was treating, it would represent malpractice. Instead, it is what I consider to be public health malpractice.

The Northampton Board of Health may not have created public health regulations that have any consistency or science base. However, they have created an excellent entry for the 2014 Hypocrisy of the Year Award.

But the truth is more nuanced. While there is no question that low-tar or "light" cigarettes are not safer, it is not the case that the introduction of filters made cigarettes more carcinogenic. I would not be able to testify in a courtroom that I believe filtered cigarettes are more dangerous than non-filtered cigarettes. Nor would I be able to testify that filtered cigarettes and non-filtered cigarettes pose equivalent cancer risk.

LAST：2014 Neweat! Wholesale Icub wax vaporizer exgo w1 |NEXT：Greenhouse Apollo Led Grow Light 450W 150*3W 110V - 240V 8:1 Customizable RED BLUE Can Be Absorbed build led growing lamp