The misinformation in the tobacco control field is so widespread that hardly a day goes by that an anti-smoking advocate somewhere doesn't publicly declare that smoking may be no more dangerous than vaping. Yesterday, it was the Sedgwick County Health Department (Wichita, KS), which wrote in an op-ed in the Kansas City Star:

The Congressmembers are wrong even on that score. The MSA clearly defines a cigarette as a product that contains tobacco. Electronic cigarettes do not contain tobacco. Thus, they do not meet the MSA's definition of a cigarette.

mat cost anywhere from 20 up over 50 and the replacement cartridges will set you back around 700-1000 for a year. This is based on smoking the equivalent of 20 e-cigarettes a day. Analogue smoking would set you back well over 2,500 per annum for the same amount of puffing.

I had intended to blog about your recent paper, but decided instead to write an open letter and to put these concerns to you directly. So, I write to express dismay at the false, misleading and damaging conclusions you have drawn from your recent paper in JAMA Pediatrics and related media communications. The errors of reasoning are elementary, but have been used to draw conclusions that are relentlessly hostile to e-cigarettes and the important public health concept of ‘tobacco harm reduction’.

LAST：Hot Selling Stainless Steel Vaporizer Colored Rainbow Stingray Mod |NEXT：Most popular no leakage ego electronic cigarette ego ce5